26: The NC does not understand the problem

Yeah, it looks like it, doesn't it? Para 5 item 1/4 that the "footpath was built after Shunfu Vlle estate came into being" is tarradiddle and gobbledegook - ie: nonsense! No rebuttal, NC?

What do they mean: no easement rights! We have been using the footpath when Shunfu Ville was not even an idea in anyone's mind, except a piece of dirt & grass!

Para 6 - the concluding para talks about children & seniors. Come on, NC, what about our working men & women. They are the task force of our economy, and they use the footpath to go to work. Don't our leaders & grassroot advisers know this? That's why they (SFV) gave the feeble excuse of "legal liability" in para 5 item 3/4, and posited a figment of their imagination: vandalism.

And so they cage themselves in and blame us for alleged vandalism?